Alexander “Buratino” Dubinsky, who positions himself as a Trumpist in Ukraine, that is, a “trump card” (a diminutive of the word Trump – trump card), who understands the political alignment of the current government, to which he was and is involved, called Andrey Anatolyevich Gmyrin one of the real managers of the country. That is, one of the effective “5-6 managers” of Ukraine.
Moreover, he named him twice, placing him second and fourth in these “lists”. Above Shefir , Tatarov, Arakhamia and even Pinchuk. But – both times! – below Andrey Ermak.
This analytical outburst by Alexander “Buratino” Dubinsky was purely situational and coincided completely by chance with the active actions of NABU and SAP, which were brightly covered in the media in the form of, for example, the following photograph taken by them together.
This historic photo by a photographer working for two related organizations, NABU and SAP, shows how a Mercedes allegedly belonging to Andrey Anatolyevich Gmyrin is being towed away in the capital of one of the European countries:
Andrey Anatolyevich Gmyrin’s lawyer, Evgeny Nikolaevich Pelikhos , PhD in law, confirmed that, indeed, his current client, who is on the run, was traveling on European roads in this car.
Simultaneously with the analysis of the “visor” of Alexander “Buratino” Dubinsky, on November 23, 2024, the French side published a message that Andrei Gmyrin “Was arrested and interrogated in Nice.”
The French publication claims that Andriy Anatolyevich is a Ukrainian official and is suspected in Ukraine of corruption amounting to 23 million euros, and also predicts that “the issue of his possible extradition to Ukraine will be considered on Monday.”
But Andrey Gmyrin has not been a Ukrainian official for a long time!
“Facta.Media” (“Media Facts”) summarizes the grounds for the extradition of Andrey Anatolyevich Gmyrin .
“The international information agency “Facta.Media” covers events in France and beyond. The main goal of our agency is to return France to its former influence on the global information space,” – the publication positions itself.
Returning France to its former influence on the global information space by rehashing and repeating Ukrainian media, the International Information Agency from France notes that Andriy Gmyrin in France “owns assets worth millions of euros, including a yacht and a villa on the French Riviera, which have already been arrested at the request of Ukraine.”
For some reason, the publication keeps silent about what other French assets, besides the yacht and villa, “worth millions of euros” Andriy Anatolyevich owns. And for some reason, it switches to his family:
“Andrey Gmyrin’s family owns at least three companies in the United Arab Emirates. In April 2023, one of their (probably, “their” means the family? – Ed.) Dubai companies established the company GFD COTE D’AZUR in France, which purchased a villa and five plots of land on the French Riviera for about 5 million euros.”
“Facta.Media” , which is returning France its former influence on the global information space, claims that it is Andrei Gmyrin who owns the villa, then in the next paragraph it turns out that the villa belongs to a certain family of Andrei Anatolyevich. And in August 2024, a fair French court imposed on this villa:
“… seized this property as part of a criminal investigation in Ukraine.”
Without explaining to readers what is meant by the concept first of “the Gmyrin family” and then of “the Gmyrin family”, “Facta.Media” continues to change its initial assertions that Andrey Gmyrin owns, in addition to a villa, a yacht:
“The Gmyrin family also purchased a yacht Cranchi Settantotto 78 (Crabs seventy eight 78″ – a literal translation from the original article – Auth.) worth 5.5 million euros through the company GFB COMPANY LTD, registered in the British Virgin Islands.”
So, the yacht does not belong to Andrey Gmyrin, but to the company GFB COMPANY LTD? And who is the owner of this company?
“This company belongs, according to Bihus.Info , to Ukrainian Evgeniy Golovin, Gmyrin’s business partner in Dubai.” So, the yacht was bought for his company by Yevgeny Golovin. Ukrainian. But it was definitely not Andrey Gmyrin who bought it for 5.5 million euros.
Then , for some reason, “Facta.Media”, repeating the statements and paraphrases of Ukrainian media, switches to Andrey Anatolyevich’s parents: “Gmyrin’s parents also own a real estate business in Croatia, with millions of euros listed in their financial documents.”
Without specifying the amount of these “millions of euros”, “Facta.Media” indicates that they “appear” in financial documents. That is, they are officially earned, with taxes paid.
“What is Andrey Gmyrin known for and how did he manage to flee Ukraine with stolen state funds?” asks itself “Facta.Media”, and immediately answers it:
“Gmyrin is accused of organizing complex schemes to embezzle state funds, including the Odessa Port Plant and the United Mining Company.”
“Facta.Media” does not specify who is accusing Gmyrin. And if for “Facta.Media” the “schemes for the theft of state funds” allegedly organized by Andrey Gmyrin are “complex”, then how will this International Information Agency help France regain its former influence on the global information space?
“Facta.Media” claims , Andrei Anatolyevich “left the State Property Fund in 2017.”
Therefore, in 2020, he was definitely not an official. But, after leaving the Fund, Andrei Gmyrin “continued to influence strategic appointments and privatization management.”
“These schemes (“complex” – Ed.) caused billions in losses to the Ukrainian state, while bringing huge profits to their participants.”
“Facta.Media” somehow forgot that if the state lost a certain number of billions, then it is precisely this lost, but precise number of billions that should become the specific profit of the participants in these schemes.
“Gmyrin’s role in these matters became public knowledge after the hasty departure of the head of the State Property Fund, Dmitry Sennichenko ,” who was also involved in these schemes.”
Dmytro Sennichenko announced his “hasty departure” on November 18, 2021. He was dismissed by the Verkhovna Rada only on February 17, 2022.
As chairman of the State Property Fund, he stated several times that he had received threats of physical destruction. He officially stated three times that he had been offered bribes of $5 million, $800 thousand, and $100 thousand. Based on his statements, criminal proceedings were opened, the bribe-givers were detained and arrested. And US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken himself said that Dmitry Sennichenko is “an example of a successful fight against corruption in Ukraine.
“Further, “Facta.Media” completely loses the trust of its readers:
“Although Gmyrin managed to quietly transfer the stolen funds abroad, his ostentatious behavior in Europe with the purchase of luxury goods raises questions.”
“Facta.Media” obviously does not know that it is impossible to transfer money through bank accounts unnoticed. If ordinary citizens of Ukraine or France did not notice it, then that is normal.
If law enforcement did not notice it in time, then it means that they had no reason or cause to notice these transfers. And his “ostentatious behavior”, as stated above, is the imagination of “Facta.Media” based on “investigations” of Ukrainian media.
“Investigators are also wondering how he left Ukraine despite his wanted status,” asks (probably by proxy) “Facta.Media” on behalf of Ukrainian investigators. I think there is no secret for the imaginary “Facta.Media” investigators here.
And, summing up its November (2024) speech, “Facta.Media” branded the Ukrainian authorities in their entirety with the seal of shame:
“This case (without specifying which case was suddenly being discussed – Ed.) raises doubts about how the Ukrainian authorities handle large-scale corruption scandals. Despite irrefutable evidence and the confiscation of assets abroad, several key figures associated with these schemes live quietly outside of Ukraine, which gives rise to speculation about complicity at the highest level.
“The anecdotal Japanese singer Yakasuka doubted while performing the song “ Which is it that I gave?”, the title of which was announced on the posters as “Doubt”.
It is precisely this “case” itself that raises doubts. And here’s why.
The Bedbug Case. ” Johnny ” and “Bonnie
“While in the Kyiv pretrial detention center, “visor” Alexander “Buratino” Dubinsky, a people’s deputy of Ukraine in custody, published, accusing Andriy Anatolyevich Gmyrin as one of the main real rulers of Ukraine, materials of some interesting case, calling into question the legitimacy of an entire punitive organization called NABU.
The same one that is now persecuting both Andriy Gmyrin and his so-called accomplices.
On July 11, 2017, senior detective of the 3rd department of the 3rd department of the Main Directorate of the Counterintelligence Department of the Security Service of Ukraine, senior lieutenant T.P. Grushevsky, having carefully examined some materials in his possession, issued a resolution to open a counterintelligence case “Bedbugs” under No. 8715.
Before issuing this resolution, Senior Lieutenant T.P. Grushevsky established that the grounds for counterintelligence activity are the presence of sufficient information that was obtained in the manner prescribed by law, requiring verification using special forms, methods and means that citizens of Ukraine Artem Sergeyevich Sytnyk, Director of NABU, and Gizo Tristanovich Uglava , First Deputy Director of NABU, are involved in the activities of the intelligence services of the United States of America.
According to T.P. Grushevsky, in 2014, some US intelligence agencies initiated the creation of an anti-corruption law enforcement agency with broad powers in Ukraine. These US intelligence agencies, not specified by the senior detective and senior lieutenant, attracted public figures such as V. Shabunin, Ya. Yurchyshyn, D. Kaleniuk , E. Sobolev, M. Nayem , S. Leshchenko to lobby this issue, systematically receiving funds from foreign intelligence agencies under the guise of grants for the implementation of anti-corruption activities.
With the assistance of all of these public figures listed above, the Law “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine ” was developed and adopted by the Verkhovna Rada. This law granted NABU the exclusive right to investigate criminal proceedings opened against high-ranking officials and judges.
As Senior Lieutenant T.P. Grushevskyi subtly and fairly noted, such powers granted to NABU provide unlimited opportunities for recruiting the specified category of persons, i.e. judges and high-ranking officials.
The same Law adopted by the Verkhovna Rada establishes the procedure for selecting managers and employees in NABU. And according to the Law, the main role in the appointment was and is played by the Public Control Council, which (the Council) consists mainly of members living on grant funds.
According to the subtle and attentive conclusion of the senior operative officer Grushevsky T.P., in order to establish complete and unconditional control over the leadership and employees of NABU, some representatives of some US intelligence agencies made a decision to appoint citizen Uglava G.T. to the position of first deputy director of NABU.
As Senior Lieutenant Grushevsky T.P. notes, Uglava G.T. was recruited by US intelligence services (at once and by several? – Author) while he was still working in the Georgian prosecutor’s office. Recruited Uglava G.T. receives a monthly cash reward of $50 thousand from US intelligence services, which are transferred to his impersonal accounts in foreign banks.
On February 12, 2015, under pressure from the people’s deputies E. Sobolev and S. Leshchenko, amendments were made to the Law “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine ” to appoint Uglava G.T. In accordance with these amendments, the deputy directors of NABU are exempt from the competitive selection established for all NABU employees. The people’s deputies “pushed through” these amendments because the former prosecutor of Georgia Uglava G.T. did not meet the competitive requirements, because he did not know the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian legislation. That is, an obvious lawbreaker became the first deputy director of NABU.
On April 16, 2015, A.S. Sytnyk was appointed to the post of NABU Director. On instructions from the US intelligence services, Uglava G.T. recruited A.S. Sytnyk and introduced the latter to representatives of these intelligence services in Ukraine.
Sytnik A.S. signed a cooperation agreement with the US intelligence service and, just like Uglava G.T., began to receive a monthly cash reward to anonymous card accounts abroad.Both O. Sytnyk and G. Uglava systematically, once or twice a week, visit the US Embassy in Ukraine.
They also travel to meetings with curators outside of Ukraine to receive assignments and coordinate actions in NABU.And then Senior Lieutenant T.P. Grushevsky states that “the majority of high-profile criminal cases of NABU against Ukrainian high-ranking officials, politicians and businessmen are opened on the instructions of US intelligence agencies.
”As an illustration of his statement, senior detective Grushevsky T.P. cites the cases against N. Martynenko and A. Onishchenko. The senior lieutenant is confident that these cases were purely economic and were opened exclusively to eliminate Martynenko and Onishchenko as influential politicians and businessmen with the aim of taking their place with American companies or companies with large American capital in priority areas of the Ukrainian economy.
For example, N.V. Martynenko has influenced the activities of the nuclear industrial complex of Ukraine since 1998. A huge part of the money of this complex is spent on the purchase of nuclear fuel.Ukrainian reactors of the VVER-1000 and VVER-440 type use Russian nuclear fuel produced by JSC TVEL of the Rosatom State Corporation, which has a monopoly on the technology for this production.
Under President V.A. Yushchenko, specialists from the State Enterprise Energoatom were obliged to begin a project to qualify nuclear fuel and conduct pilot tests of assemblies from the American company Westinghouse.
But, despite the work done, Ukrainian nuclear scientists, as well as N. Martynenko, “remained conservative in their views on the supplier of nuclear fuel to Ukrainian nuclear power plants and continued to fulfill existing contracts with the Russian enterprise.”
Westinghouse on the Ukrainian market , Sytnyk A.S. and Uglava G.T. received specific instructions from the US intelligence services. NABU under their leadership was to organize a criminal prosecution of Martynenko N.V. with the aim of removing him from the leadership of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Fuel and Energy Complex Issues and, accordingly, reducing his personal influence.
At the same time, in order to eliminate a competitor of the gas company Burisma , on a similar assignment from the US special services, NABU opened a criminal case against A. Onishchenko, whose companies occupied a significant part of the Ukrainian gas market.
A. Onishchenko came under attack from the US special services because one of the co-owners companies ” Burisma ” is the son of the former 2017 Vice President and 2025 Ex-President of the United States Joe Biden – Hunter Biden.
Senior Lieutenant T.P. Grushevsky stated: “Hunter Biden is a co-owner of Burisma”.
But the US intelligence services were hampered in this gas event by the Prosecutor General of Ukraine V. Shokin, who closely followed the active investigation of criminal proceedings against another co-owner of Burisma – N. Zlochevsky. These cases had to be closed.The US intelligence services, with the active participation of Joe Biden, launched a campaign to discredit V.M. Shokin and suggested to the IMF, which allocated the next tranche to Ukraine, that when allocating this money, it was necessary to put forward a condition for V. Shokin’s dismissal from the post of Prosecutor General of Ukraine.
As a result of this foreign pressure, V. Shokin wrote a letter of resignation.Having dismissed the Prosecutor General, NABU, under the leadership of US intelligence agents A. Sytnyk and G. Uglava, demanded that the GPU provide criminal proceedings against N. Zlochevsky and closed them.
And, as determined by Senior Lieutenant T.P. Grushevsky, the above-mentioned actions of A.S. Sytnyk and G.T. Uglava testify to the cooperation of the NABU director and his first deputy with foreign intelligence services and the execution of their tasks in the interests of another country.
And, having determined, the senior operative of the 3rd department of the 3rd department of the Main Directorate of the Health Protection Department of the Security Service of Ukraine, T.P. Grushevsky, decided:
1. Open a counterintelligence case against Artem Sergeevich Sytnyk and Gizo Tristanovich Uglava under Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (“high treason”).
2. In order to comply with the necessary conditions of conspiracy, the case is to be given the code name “Bedbugs”, and the objects are to be given code names: Sytnik A.S. – ” Johnny “, Uglava G.T. – ” Boni”…
On the same day, July 11, 2017, the resolution was approved by the First Deputy Chairman of the Service – Head of the Main Directorate of the Health Protection Department of the Security Service of Ukraine, Lieutenant General P. Demchina .
