One day, in 2011, Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko transferred $1,150,000 (one million one hundred fifty thousand US dollars) to citizen Dubinsky Anatoly Alexandrovich. He transferred it voluntarily and from the bottom of his heart.
Lipkovsky was present during the procedure of transferring and receiving these banknotes.
Fourteen years later, the well-known specialist in the recovery of bad debts, Igor Alekseevich Muzyka, made a completely responsible statement to the victim, Aleksandr Nikolaevich Tkachenko, that he would repay this debt within thirty calendar days. And he even wrote a corresponding receipt:
In this historic document signed by the high contracting parties on May 20, 2025, Tkachenko A. and Muzyka I. agreed to provide legal services. In all likelihood, in all of Kyiv and its environs, Oleksandr Nikolayevich could not find a more qualified lawyer than lawyer Igor Oleksiyovych Muzyka. This sometimes happens.
“For the sum of $1 million 150 thousand returned to me by Tkachenko A.N., I undertake to give Muzyka I. 50% (fifty percent) of the sum received,” Aleksandr Nikolaevich swore by the receipt. The victim and the lawyer were unable to calculate the exact number of banknotes that make up half of the sum of $1,150,000 to be received in the future.
The term of 30 calendar days set in the receipt was kindly proposed by Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko in response to Igor Alekseevich Muzyka’s assertion that he would return the money stolen by Anatoly Aleksandrovich Dubinsky within “seven to ten days”. Lawyer Igor Aleksandrovich Muzyka assured his long-time comrade Tkachenko of the speed of execution of the contract into effect and only in order to obtain this receipt with a 50% discount.
“I would never have signed up for these 50% if Igor had not convinced me that he would repay the debt within 7-10 days,” lamented Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko, having witnessed this historical document.
Since the receipt, according to the terms of this same receipt, was valid only in the original, it remained with Alexander Nikolaevich. Igor Alekseevich Muzyka photographed the sacred paper and sent it, despite the certificate that “transfer of the receipt to third parties is prohibited (invalid)” to interested parties. That is, he sent an invalid photograph.
Lipkovsky and Anatoly Dubinsky, “within 7-10 days” ? The question is very interesting.
Music of Music
Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko and his brother, Nikolai Nikolaevich, as owners and managers of their large enterprise, worked closely with Swedbank in 2010. They took out a loan from this bank.
In the same 2010, Swedbank , according to Alexander Nikolaevich, “started to pump and they demanded early repayment of the loan.” Alexander Tkachenko suggested that the bank restructure the loan or discount it. This wise proposal of Tkachenko was rejected by Swedbank . And, naturally, Alexander Nikolaevich began to look for ways to resolve the credit issue.
Unfortunately for Alexander Tkachenko, he had an old acquaintance, Anatoly Nikolaevich Lipkovsky , who wholeheartedly understood the brothers’ credit problem and promised to help them. He assured Alexander Nikolaevich that he, in turn, had a certain acquaintance who could possibly solve this so far unsolvable problem. And after some time, Lipkovsky brought the ” fixer ” Anatoly Alexandrovich Dubinsky to the brothers’ enterprise.
Anatoly Dubinsky was so sympathetic to the brothers’ situation that he personally visited their plant in Kotsyubinskoye to get to know them. This was at the end of the summer of 2010.
Soon after their acquaintance, the Tkachenko brothers paid a return business visit to the office of Anatoly Aleksandrovich Dubinsky, located on Esplanadnaya Street in Kiev. During the negotiations, Anatoly Aleksandrovich Dubinsky, the “solver” of Tkachenko’s credit problems , announced that the budget for the solution would be $600,000 (six hundred thousand US dollars). A certain law firm controlled by Anatoly Dubinsky would be handling the resolution of lawsuits in courts.
Lipkovsky, who was present at the negotiations and agreements, assured Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko that he was the guarantor of this deal with Anatoly Dubinsky. They agreed to that.
Over the next two years, there were lawsuits between Tkachenko’s firm and Swedbank . During these same two years, Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko, in parts and often in the presence of his long-time comrade Anatoly Lipkovsky , handed over US dollars in cash to the ” fixer ” Anatoly Dubinsky.
The outcome of this cooperation was disastrous for the Tkachenko brothers. They lost all the court cases. And the amount they paid to Anatoly Aleksandrovich Dubinsky, instead of the $600,000 he had previously declared, increased almost twofold: to $1,150,000.
Naturally, Aleksandr Nikolaevich Tkachenko, having simultaneously gathered Dubinsky’s ” fixer ” and Lipkovsky’s guarantor in the latter’s office, demanded the return of the money he had spent on useless trials. Anatoly Nikolaevich Lipkovsky agreed with the claims and by 2013 had returned about $250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand US dollars) in parts. But his namesake Anatoly Aleksandrovich Dubinsky categorically refused to return the dollars and filed a complaint against Aleksandr Nikolaevich Tkachenko with the UBOP.
For eight months after Dubinsky’s statement, Alexander Tkachenko came to the office on Gorky Street as if it were work. He was threatened there, he was warned, he was persuaded. In the end, the same comrade and guarantor Anatoly Nikolaevich Lipkovsky offered Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko to close this criminal case for only $250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand US dollars).
The owner of the plant Tkachenko agreed to the offer. And returned to Anatoly Nikolaevich Lipkovsky those same $250,000 he received as a refund for the two-year warranty.
It is unknown how much of this money the investigator and his superiors at the UBOP received. But the criminal case against Alexander Tkachenko was closed.
“They didn’t return anything else to me,” lamented Alexander Nikolaevich, by “they” he meant Lipkovsky and Dubinsky. “They were left with a debt of $1,150,000.”
And it was this debt that lawyer Igor Alekseevich Muzyka promised to return to Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko.
Surprised by the naivety of the former owner of the plant Tkachenko, who had suffered from the “fixers” many times, I had to inquire what it was about the signatory of the receipt that had so charmed him. Alexander Nikolaevich’s answer was truly unique.
It turned out that Igor Alekseevich Muzyka had been singing arias on big business themes to him and his companion for over a year. He was simultaneously building large factories in Bulgaria and producing drones in Ukraine. He had a huge business in Kuwait, where every sheikh knew who Igor Muzyka was. And Europe was keeping up with the Arabs!
And, with hope for the brilliant business prospects extolled by Igor Muzyka, Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko still sincerely trusts his old comrade. These extollings in the Middle Eastern, Eastern and European styles, according to the enchanted former owner of the plant, have been going on for a year now.
Igor Alekseevich Muzyka sang all these songs at our first meeting. Moreover, he lied about twenty times, answering counter questions, generally reminiscent of the famous foreman from Operation Y, furrowing, like that movie hero, the “spaces of the Bolshoi Theater.” Igor Muzyka’s fantasies are truly irrepressible and grandiose:
And, having received the coveted photo of the receipt, Igor Alekseevich Muzyka managed to get two more historically important documents from Aleksandr Nikolaevich Tkachenko. The first document is a recording of a telephone conversation between Aleksandr Tkachenko and an unknown citizen, on the one hand, and Anatoly Nikolaevich Lipkovsky , on the other. In this nice friendly conversation, Lipkovsky admits to receiving and returning $250,000 to them.
The second document is the resolution of the investigator, police major Oksana Vasilievna Yaremenko, on recognizing Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko as a victim in criminal proceedings No. 12025111040000211 dated March 24, 2025, on the grounds of a criminal offense under Part 5 of Article 190 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In his statement to the police, Alexander Tkachenko named the ” fixer ” Dubinsky and the guarantor of the ” fixer ” Lipkovsky who deceived him.
I am not sure that Alexander Nikolaevich Tkachenko recommended Igor Alexeevich Muzyka to share these documents with outsiders. But it happened, accompanied by another fairy-tale aria of the former Deputy Minister of Construction of Ukraine Igor Muzyka.
“The music can be heard again…”
