Sergey Vashchuk. Abuser of trust

24.04.2025
ващук фото
To the “scam” of his friend for $171,500 since the beginning of this millennium . Already in the first years of the millennium, ” Serunchik ” became rich, in accordance with the then dollar to hryvnia exchange rate, by more than $100,000. As Fyodor Fyodorovich Romash claims – and these claims are supported by relevant documents – “the debtor Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich, abusing trust”, borrowed from Romash F.F. funds in the amount of 566,994 UAH.

The relevant documents – loan agreements – indicate that “Grey” borrowed money from the creditor on November 15, 2000, December 2 of the same year, January 15, 2001, April 15, 2001, January 15, 2002 and April 11, 2002. He borrowed and abused the trust of Fyodor Fyodorovich Romash .

When the abuse of trust in ” Serunchikovo ” overflowed the patience of the creditor Romash F.F., and Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk refused to return the money he had borrowed, Romash Fedor Fedorovich was forced to sue the debtor “Sery”.

On October 20, 2004, the Fair Obolonsky District Court of Kyiv (case No. 2-23/2004) determined that Vashchuk Serhiy Stepanovich must pay the creditor Romash F.F. 659,314 UAH of debt in accordance with the loan agreements. At that time, this hryvnia amount was equivalent to $123,467 at the official exchange rate of the NBU.

The court indicated that the principal amount of the debt was UAH 566,994, UAH 91,120 – 3 % per annum of the overdue amount of the debt and the established inflation index for the entire overdue period of “ Serunchik ”, and UAH 1,700 – state duty.

The case of professional abuser of trust Sergey Stepanovich Vashchuk was considered by the Obolonsky District Court due to the fact that ” Serunchik ” at that time actually lived on Obolonsky Prospekt, in that very famous apartment in the bathroom of which he poured chemicals for car washes. But, as the attentive reader will remember, Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich was registered in Sevastopol, on Admirala Makarov Street, which he confidentially informed ” Urbi et orbi » in its latest receipt, this time dated 2018:

And, of course, as a professional abuser of trust, Vashchuk S.S. was sure that the Kievan Romash Fedor Fedorovich would not get to him, a resident of Sevastopol. But Fedor Romash got to him.

On October 21, 2012, after eight years of Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk’s looping , who was in no way willing to return the money he borrowed, the Nakhimovsky District Court of Sevastopol finally put the abuser of trust in his place by its decision (case No. 2-1086/11). The court ordered Romash F.F. to pay the inflation index for the period of delay, i.e. the looping of Vashchuk S.S., for the period from November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2010 in the amount of 435,067 UAH and 3 % per annum in the amount of 93,471 UAH: a total of 528,538 UAH.

This was, according to the NBU rate, another $67,000.

In addition, by the same decision, the Nakhimovsky District Court of the city of Sevastopol collected from the abuser of trust Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich in favor of the creditor Romash Fedor Fedorovich a court fee (1,700 UAH) and 120 UAH spent by the creditor on engineering and technical support for the court hearing. This is another $ 230 that ” Serunchik ” had to pay to Romash F.F.

“Grey”, as a professional abuser of trust, decided not to pay both these inflation and annual fees and professionally filed an appeal. On May 31, 2012, the Sevastopol City Court of Appeal (case No. 22c-1028/2012) rejected the appeal of Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk, leaving the decision of the Nakhimovsky District Court of Sevastopol in force.

In connection with this circumstance that upset ” Serunchik “, writs of execution No. 2-1086/11 for the amount of 528,538 UAH and No. 2-1086/11 for the amount of 1,820 UAH, issued on September 12, 2012 by the Nakhimovsky District Court of Sevastopol, were presented by the creditor for execution. But professional abuser of trust Sergey Vashchuk was not going to fulfill the contents of these writs. Nevertheless, despite the resistance of ” Serunchik “, the department of the state executive service of the Obolonsky District Justice Department of the city of Kiev opened enforcement proceedings.

The Nakhimovsky District Court of Sevastopol also countered the resistance of Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk. On April 4, 2013, Judge T.B. Semenukha issued a default judgment on the abuser of trust S.S. Vashchuk, who fled to Kiev (case No. 765/475/13-c). By this judgment, the debtor “Seryi” was ordered to pay in favor of the creditor F.F. Romash the amount of the inflation index for the period of delay of UAH 53,816 and 3 % per annum in the amount of UAH 35,405, plus a court fee of UAH 892.21.

The decision came into force on April 16, 2013. The writ of execution for the amount of UAH 90,113.21, issued by the Nakhimovsky District Court of Sevastopol on July 8, 2013, was presented for execution by the creditor F. F. Romash to the enforcement service of the Obolonsky District of Kiev, where enforcement proceedings No. 38984791 were opened.

Since Fyodor Fyodorovich Romash was persistent in his desire to punish the abuser of his trust, Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk, and return his money, swindled from him by ” Serunchik “, he insisted on the forced collection of part of the debt. And the enforcement service was forced to force Vashchuk S.S. to put up for sale a four-room apartment No. 191 in house No. 7-B on Obolonsky Avenue in Kiev. That very ” bottling shop ” of detergents.

The total area of this apartment is 61.2 sq. m., the price equal to the initial cost of the property and at which it was transferred for sale was 258,326 UAH. Fedor Fedorovich Romash expressed a desire to keep 1/3 of the total area of this apartment, which was being sold but not sold.

As a result, on June 6, 2012, 1/3 of the apartment, approved by the resolution of the head of the executive service of the Obolonsky district justice department, became the property of Romash F.F. Based on this resolution, the next day, June 7, 2012, the notary issued Fedor Fedorovich a certificate of acquisition of property from a public auction, if the public auction did not take place.

This was the very same apartment into which the abuser of trust, Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk, did not allow the owner of 1/3 of this apartment, Fyodor Fyodorovich Romash , and his sixteen-year-old son, for which he was awarded the well-deserved title of “pederast” by the latter.

“ Part of the first article of Article 1050 of the Central Committee of Ukraine states that the employer, without returning the amount of money, must pay the penny amount in accordance with Article 625 of this Code.

This is due in part to another article 625 of the Central Committee of Ukraine, a debtor who has stitched a penny claim , on the opportunity of the creditor of the claim to pay the sum to the government in accordance with the established inflation index for the entire hour of stitching as well as three percent of the actual amount of the overdue amount, since a different amount of interest is not established by agreement or law.

Therefore, once the accountant has not verified the sum of the position, we will now put it together: the sum of the position will be adjusted to the established inflation index for the entire hour of completing the penny duty ; interest on the position, unless otherwise established by the agreement or law, is charged in accordance with the agreement on the position or the NBU tax rate for the entire line of crediting the position; three percent of the total amount of the overdue amount, unless a different amount is established by agreement or law.

At this rate of inflation, 3% of the current amount of the overdue amount (Article 625 of the Central Committee of Ukraine) and interest on the position (Article 1048 of the Central Committee of Ukraine) extend payments until the actual repayment of the debt . “

This was decided by the Judicial Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine (Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated October 19, 2016 in case No. 6-2129cs/16).

If initially the amount of debt of the abuser of trust Sergey Stepanovich Vashchuk was 566,994 UAH, then, as a result of the dodges of ” Serunchik ” and the inevitable punishment in the form of a 3% inflation index, by March 21, 2016, the SBU informant “Seryi” already owed 1,021,459 UAH 21 kopecks (certificate of the enforcement service department of the Obolonsky district).

Writ of execution No. 756/10701/16-c, issued on December 14, 2018, determined that Vashchuk S.S. owed Romash F.F., in addition to the above-mentioned figure, which exceeded one million, 486,480 UAH and 4,864.80 in legal costs.

The total amount of debt according to court decisions was UAH 1,512,804.01.

Let me remind you that literally a week before the publication of this writ of execution, millionaire debtor Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk wrote his famous receipt dated December 7, 2018, confirming that he had already “cheated” his acquaintance for $ 171,500 . Which, of course, testifies to the professional growth of the professional abuser of trust Vashchuk S.S., the SBU informant “Grey” (aka ” Serunchik “).

Sergey Vashchuk. The failed bankrupt

” Serunchik “, due to his legal knowledge, on the basis of which he “solved” the legal and other issues of Sergei Vadimovich Kiriya, refusing to repay the debt to Fyodor Fyodorovich Romash , applied to the Kiev Economic Court with a request to declare him bankrupt.

The “lawyer” and “holder” of the missing diploma of higher education, Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk, at first did not know, and then forgot, that according to Part 1 of Article 598 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, his obligation to repay the debt to Romash F.F. ceases to be valid in the event of grounds provided for by the agreement or law.

The greatest “lawyer” and, without quotation marks, the greatest informer of the SBU at first did not know, and then forgot, that, according to Article 625 of the same Code, the debtor is not released from liability in the event of his inability to fulfill a financial obligation.

And I didn’t know at all, and completely forgot ” Serunchik “, that in accordance with Part 1 of Article 509 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, an obligation is a legal relationship in which one party (the debtor Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich) is obliged to perform certain actions in favor of the other party (the creditor Romash Fedor Fedorovich) in the form of transferring property, performing work, rendering services, paying off a debt, or refrain from a certain action, and the creditor has the right to demand that the debtor fulfill his obligation. Instead, he went to the Kiev Economic Court.

It should be noted that on November 4, 1997, Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk registered as an individual entrepreneur at his place of residence on Obolonsky Prospekt, in house number 7-B, in apartment 191.

His activities, despite the fact that ” Serunchik ” does not have a higher education diploma, as well as “Grey’s” specialization as a ” fixer ” of legal and other issues of his owner Kiriya Sergei Vadimovich, are described as follows:

« 52. Retail trade; repair of household items and specially designed items .”

That is, when registering as an entrepreneur, Sergey Stepanovich Vashchuk saw himself not as a lawyer, but, as he had previously claimed, as a TV repairman. ” Serunchik ” discovered legal abilities in his almost Aryan organism in 2006, when he decided to “screw” Fedor Fedorovich Romash with the help of the court . To carry out this ” swindle ” event, he applied to the Commercial Court of the city of Kiev. And this is what came of it.

Sole proprietor Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich asked the court to declare him bankrupt, citing the fact that he cannot repay the debt to Romash F.F. due to the fact that he does not have property that covers the amount of his debt.

Judge Pasko Nikolay Vasilyevich opened the proceedings by his ruling of December 29, 2006. And already on March 15, 2007, by the ruling of the same court, sole proprietor Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich was declared bankrupt. At the same time, a liquidation procedure was opened, and arbitration manager Gusar Ivan Alekseevich was appointed as the liquidator of the bankrupt “Sery”.

It is quite possible that this is where the connections between the SBU informant Vashchuk S.S. and Roman Vladimirovich Bratkov grow.

However, something did not work out for the ” fixer ” ” Serunchik “. By the decision of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine dated September 3, 2008, on the basis of cassation, the case was returned to the Economic Court of Kiev for a new hearing. And the new judge considered the following.

It turned out that, when filing a bankruptcy petition with the court in December 2006, sole proprietor Vashchuk S.S. confirmed that he had accounts payable in the amount of 887,343 UAH. But, in addition to Romash Fedor Fedorovich, the abuser of trust owed the Limited Liability Company (LLC) “Fund of Legal Initiatives”.

Serunchik owed this “Fund” 157,678 UAH, and this debt was confirmed by the decision of the Kiev Economic Court on November 17, 2006.

Fedor Fedorovich Romash provided the decisions of the Obolonsky District Court for this review of the case, from which it followed that the consideration of cases on the debts of ” Serunchik ” were considered as a debt of an individual to an individual. That is, Vashchuk Sergey Stepanovich was determined by the courts as a debtor as a completely individual, and not a subject of entrepreneurial activity: FOP Vashchuk S.S.

The court also established that the debt of “Seryi” arose on the basis of loan agreements, as well as a receipt from Sergey Stepanovich Vashuk on the receipt of cash. As noted in the decision of the Kiev Economic Court, Sergey Stepanovich Vashuk signed and signed both the agreements and receipts on the basis of a passport and only and only as an individual.

Apparently, having gained some judicial experience, on December 7, 2018, “ Serunchik ” wrote another promissory note to another of his good friends without indicating his passport details and his actual place of residence and registration in Obolon .

The court also noted that a criminal case had been opened against the abuser of trust, Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk, within the framework of which the original loan agreements and receipts were seized by law enforcement agencies on May 13, 2003, and copies of the protocols of these seizures were submitted to the commercial court.

The court reviewed the case in April 2010 and established a moratorium on debt collection from Serunchik .

However, this moratorium did not help Sergei Stepanovich Vashchuk.

CONTACT USwith ease
Kyiv, st. Lyatoshinsky, 03191
GET IN TOUCHsocial links
TRADEMARK (TM)
https://gpu.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo-gpu_f.png
CONTACT USwith ease
Kyiv, st. Lyatoshinsky, 03191
TRADEMARK (TM)
https://gpu.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo-gpu_f.png
GET IN TOUCHsocial links

Copyright 2022 All rights reserved. Gennadiy Ustinov

Copyright 2022 All rights reserved. Gennadiy Ustinov